The eyes don't have it

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)

Yesterday I went to an opthalmologist to be checked for glaucoma risk. My optometrist had referred me because she didn't like the look of my optic nerves. I'm rather young to have glaucoma, but the thinking is that if things look the least bit sketchy, it's best to at least do some tests to establish a baseline from which one can track the eyes over time. So I drove up to Boulder and visited the very efficiently-run offices of an opthalmologist and two optometrists. (I imagine the office is fairly profitable, since the staff seem well-trained, handled much of the examination themselves and left the MD to evaluation and counseling roles.)

The first diagnostic tool was an ordinary intraocular pressure check using the Glowing Blue Plastic Rod Against The Eye. If it's done right you don't notice that something is touching your cornea, and it was done right. Pressures were normal, though a little on the high end of normal. You see, many kinds of glaucoma are caused by the fluid pressure inside the eye being too high, putting stress on the optic nerve and cornea.

Next was a very fancy computerized retinal tomography ("Heidelberg Retinal Tomograph") that used retinal imaging to develop a three-dimensional image of the optic nerve's attachment to the retina. Strictly speaking, according to its manufacturer, this device is a "Confocal Laser Scanning System for Quantitative Three-Dimensional Imaging of the Posterior Segment." Whatever one calls it, this is a very slick machine. It is also no doubt very expensive, since my three-minute visit with it cost my insurance carrier well over a hundred dollars. But it meant I avoided having my eyes dilated or enduring a long and tedious field-of-vision test, and it did give a very fast and detailed first impression of what's going on in the backs of my eyes.

The next part of the exam is the part that sends shivers down my spine to think of it. See, like many people, I'm very protective of my eyes, and the thought of sitting there passively while something touches the surface of my eyes just creeps the hell out of me. The next test involved a device called a "pachymeter." Its name sounds like it should be used to measure elephants. It's actually used to measure the thickness of the cornea. For this test, the medical technician numbs the eye with an anaesthetic drop and then — and this is the part that sends shivers down my spine a full day later — touches the cornea with the probe with enough pressure that the cornea bends slightly, in ways not at all like how it bends during ordinary eye focusing, and space seems to warp and wiggle. I don't have too many issues with space wiggling as long as I don't get sucked into a singularity or lose the effects of gravity, but the thought of being repeatedly touched on the cornea just gives me the creeps. Fortunately the anaesthetic worked, but after it wore off several hours later it felt just a little sore, like, well, like I'd been poked in the eyes a few hours before.

Fortunately there is nothing prompting immediate alarm, though we will have to keep track of the eyes over time. I'm considered a "glaucoma suspect." The immediate practical implication is that I will have to be poked in the eyes repeatedly. I'm glad that part happens only once per year.

Categories

0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: The eyes don't have it.

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.tph-lex.com/cgi-bin/mt-mcfp-tb.cgi/188

About

tph is Tim Hadley. (details) You can e-mail me at tph at tph (hyphen) lex dotcom. All times are U.S. Mountain Time (GMT -07:00).
Sometimes I write about the law, or things related to the law. Please remember that materials on this site are not offered as legal advice. Do not attempt to substitute any material or information on this site for the advice of competent counsel licensed to practice law in your jurisdiction. For more on that point, check out What this site is not. Opinions expressed on this website are my own and should not be imputed to employers, colleagues, or anyone else. Heck, opinions expressed on this website might not even be mine.

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by tph published on January 27, 2005 11:54 AM.

Ernie the Attorney, interviewed at JDBliss was the previous entry in this blog.

Andrew Cohen on the demise of Gorsuch Kirgis LLC is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Powered by Movable Type 4.1