Support Dwindling for Hard-Wired Copy Protection?

| | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)

This CNet article by John Borland says that several companies plan to avoid building digital rights technologies into chips in hopes of attaining the necessary functionality through software.

Despite a move away from building the rights-management tools deeply into chips, chipmakers' strategies remain widely varied. Given the long lead time in designing and building chips--often 18 months or more--this is one sign that DRM support is likely to be scattered and haphazard for some time to come.

Giant Texas Instruments has long eschewed hard-coding DRM technology into its chips, for example, despite the potential speed and memory gains.

"Our philosophy has always been that DRM should be software," said Randy Cole, chief technologist for Texas Instruments' Internet audio business. "The advantage to that is that it's changeable in the field."

What that means is that if a consumer is able to break through the antipiracy technology on a device such as an MP3 player, it can be restored automatically the next time the device is connected to the Net, Cole said.

This doesn't mean "no DRM," but it may mean "more flexible DRM," and allows for the possibility that companies could revise bad DRM technological standards without obsoleting recent equipment. However, the article notes, major players like Intel and Microsoft still plan to pursue hard-coded DRM implementations.

Categories

0 TrackBacks

Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Support Dwindling for Hard-Wired Copy Protection?.

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.tph-lex.com/cgi-bin/mt-mcfp-tb.cgi/131

About

tph is Tim Hadley. (details) You can e-mail me at tph at tph (hyphen) lex dotcom. All times are U.S. Mountain Time (GMT -07:00).
Sometimes I write about the law, or things related to the law. Please remember that materials on this site are not offered as legal advice. Do not attempt to substitute any material or information on this site for the advice of competent counsel licensed to practice law in your jurisdiction. For more on that point, check out What this site is not. Opinions expressed on this website are my own and should not be imputed to employers, colleagues, or anyone else. Heck, opinions expressed on this website might not even be mine.

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by tph published on March 11, 2003 11:33 AM.

More Creative Commons Variety to Come... was the previous entry in this blog.

Rep. Lofgren Introduces Balance Act is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Powered by Movable Type 4.1